USPTO serial 79082259
ANYBOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4296765Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 2013
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANYBOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP. O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR COMPUTERS AND OTHER PLATFORMS, NAMELY, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS (PDAS) AND MOBILE PHONES; INTERACTION DEVICES, NAMELY, HUMAN INTERFACE DEVICES AND COMPUTER INPUT DEVICE, NAMELY, INPUT DEVICES FOR COMPUTERS AND INTERFACES AND PERIPHERAL DEVICES FOR COMPUTERS; INTERACTION DEVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER CHIPS, ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS, MICRO COMPUTERS, OPTICAL AND DIGITAL TRANSMITTERS, RADIOS AND SONAR COORDINATE INPUT APPARATUS FOR MAN MACHINES, HUMAN-COMPUTER AND/OR HUMAN-HUMAN INTERACTION USING TACTILE, OPTICAL AND SONIC FEEDBACK; COMPUTER DISPLAY AND INPUT SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF LCD PROJECTORS, MULTIMEDIA PROJECTORS, VIDEO PROJECTORS, DATA PROJECTORS, CAMERAS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE PRESENTATION OF IMAGES AND REGISTRATION OF OBJECTS; ELECTRONIC PENS AND POINTING DEVICES, NAMELY, LASER POINTERS AND WIRELESS PRESENTERS IN THE NATURE OF A WIRELESS REMOTE LASER POINTER FOR DRAWING AND WRITING FOR COMPUTER ASSISTED PRESENTATIONS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED OFFICE WORK; ELECTRONIC PENS USING PATTERN RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION; OPTICAL POSITION AND MOTION TRACKING DEVICES AND SYSTEMS TO FIND POSITION AND MOVEMENT FOR OPTICAL MOTION CAPTURE AND OPTICAL MOTION TRACKING, NAMELY, MOTION DETECTORS AND OPTICAL SENSORS; EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTS FOR ELECTRONIC WRITING ON WALLS OR OTHER SURFACES, NAMELY, INTERACTIVE COMPUTER WHITE BOARDS; CAMERA CHIPS IN THE NATURE OF A LINEAR IMAGE SENSOR AND PROCESSING CHIPS TO BE USED IN CAMERAS; CAMERAS WITH SENSORS FOR USE WITH VIDEO PROJECTORS; PROJECTING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, LCD PROJECTORS, MULTIMEDIA PROJECTORS, VIDEO PROJECTORS, DATA PROJECTORS, AND SCREENS, NAMELY, FLAT PANEL DISPLAY SCREENS, COMPUTER SCREENS, VIDEO SCREENS, PROJECTION SCREENS, REAR PROJECTION SCREENS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMMUNICATING BETWEEN COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW INDEX AS
- Other trademarks owned by EPSON Norway Research and Development AS
- Other trademarks owned by EPSON Norway Research and Development AS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ANYBOARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 4, 2020 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ISMR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |