Drawing for KING ARTHUR

USPTO serial 79082300

KING ARTHUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3892881Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 21, 2010
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KING ARTHUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine, spirits and liqueursSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 21, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 23, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 21, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 27, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance