Drawing for ROCKLAND

USPTO serial 79082335

ROCKLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033All alcoholic wines; spirits and liqueurs; alcopops; alcoholic cocktails made with or comprising spirits distilled from the sap and/or the juice of the coconut flower and/or any other part of the coconut tree and/or the palm treeSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 8, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 18, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 26, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 25, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 23, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 27, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 6, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 30, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 2, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 30, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 3, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 3, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 3, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2010RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Jun 1, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 30, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 27, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance