USPTO serial 79082430
TORFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4014493Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2011
- Examiner
- HSU, FONG
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TORFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Machine couplings and transmission components, except for land vehicles; ] couplings other than for land vehicles, namely, couplings for ships' main and auxiliary drives and for generators; machine couplings, except for land vehicles; [ clutches for machines and other than for land vehicles; ] shaft couplings for machines and for use in vehicles other than land vehicles [ ; anti-friction bearings for machines; transmission chains, other than for land vehicles; transmission shafts, other than for land vehicles; brake segments, other than for land vehicles; joints being structural parts of engines; pressure rollers being structural parts of machine couplings, of couplings for ships' main and auxiliary drives and couplings for generators, and other than for land vehicles; springs being structural parts of machines; crankcases for machines, motors and engines; gear boxes other than for land vehicles; universal joints being cardan joints for machines, for ships' main and auxiliary drives, for pumps and not for land vehicles; bearings being machine parts; bearing brackets for machines; all goods excluding rubber suspension axles for use on vehicles ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Couplings, namely, shaft couplings for land vehicles [ ; transmission shafts for land vehicles; shock absorbers for vehicles; torsion bars for vehicles; all goods excluding rubber suspension axles for use on vehicles ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | [ Installation, maintenance and repair of machine coupling and transmission components; installation, maintenance and repair of gear boxes; installation, maintenance and repair of vehicles; repair information pertaining to reconditioning machines, motors, engines, gear boxes and couplings; reconditioning machines, motors, engines, gear boxes and couplings that have been worn or partially destroyed; all services excluding rubber suspension axles for use on vehicles ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hackforth GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Hackforth GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Hackforth GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named TORFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |