Drawing for SILCA

USPTO serial 79082523

SILCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3964490Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 24, 2011
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Hardware and software for controlling and operating electronic key machines; facilities management hardware and software, namely, software to control building environment, access and security systemsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 22, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 10, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 24, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 22, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 3, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 24, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 18, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance