Drawing for AURIX

USPTO serial 79082615

AURIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3913295Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 1, 2011
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AURIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Jordan

198 Champion CourtSan Jose, CA 95134United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microcontroller; integrated circuits, semiconductorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 13, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 22, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 22, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 22, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 1, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 1, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 1, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 1, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2010NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Jul 19, 2010NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 24, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance