Drawing for GENESIS

USPTO serial 79082745

GENESIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENESIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water filters for ponds, fishponds, aquaria; disinfectant apparatus in the nature of disinfectant dispensers for ponds, fishponds, aquaria; purification apparatus in the nature of bioreactors for use in the treatment of water for ponds, fishponds, aquariaSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 13, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 11, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 11, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 27, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 12, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 12, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 23, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 12, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 23, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 11, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance