Drawing for VIRTO

USPTO serial 79082789

VIRTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3980198Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 21, 2011
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly Gambrel

Kimberly Gambrel Dinsmore & Shohl LLPOne South Main Street, Suite 1300Dayton, OH 45402-2058UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Vibratory screen separators; electric motors for vibratory screen separators; vibratory feeders for feeding sand, gravel, aggregates, stone, minerals, ore, metal, coal, ceramics, glass, plastics, chemicals, powders, foodstuffs, agricultural products, wood, recyclables and waste into vibratory screen separators; screens for vibratory screen separators; conveyors for conveying sand, gravel, aggregates, stone, minerals, ore, metal, coal, ceramics, glass, plastics, chemicals, powders, foodstuffs, agricultural products, wood, recyclables and waste to and from vibratory screen separators; vibration amplifiersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Computers, computer hardware and computer software and computer programs for use in vibrating screening machines; microchips for use in vibrating screening machines; integrated circuits for use in vibrating screening machines; computer software, programs, microchips and integrated circuits for use in operating vibration machines, screening machines and sifting machines and in vibration machine systems and industrial screening processes; plug adaptors for use in vibration machines, screening machines and sifting machines; structural and replacements parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods within this international classSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Mining extractionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Engineering services; technological services and research and design in the field of mining extraction and industrial screening; industrial research services in the field of mining extraction; design and development of computer hardware and software for use in the field of mining extraction and industrial screening; development of technology, namely, of vibrating screening machines and development of computer software and programs relating to accelerated vibration in screening, sifting and vibrating machines; providing of information, advice and consultancy relating to the aforesaid, namely, development of computer software and hardware and computer software and program consultation in relation to accelerated vibration screening, sifting and vibration machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 15, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 27, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 26, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 26, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 21, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 5, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 18, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance