Drawing for ECOSAVE

USPTO serial 79082947

ECOSAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4004462Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 2, 2011
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ECOSAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah M. Stemer

Sarah M. Stemer Lerner Greenberg Stemer LLPPO Box 2480Hollywood, FL 33022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for plastic working, namely, machines for plasticizing plastics, machines for agglomerating plastics, machines for comminuting plastics, machines for granulating plastics, plastics extruding machines, extruder screws being parts of plastics extruding machines; machinery for the mechanical recycling of synthetic resinous materials, namely, machines for recycling treatment of plastics and for treating plastics waste; machines for filtering and degassing plastic melts; plastic melt filters for plastic extrusion machines; filtering devices for plastic melts, namely, machines for filtering plastic melts; degassers used in plastic extrusion machines for degassing the plastic melt; back-purge filters, filtering screens, screen changers, screens and filters all being parts of machines for the extruding, cutting, comminuting, compacting and homogenizing of plastic materials, plastic foils, plastic bottles or plastic wasteACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 22, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 22, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 20, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 2, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 30, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 7, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Aug 7, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Aug 7, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 20, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 2, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 2, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Mar 9, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 8, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 28, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 26, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 17, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance