USPTO serial 79082982
ARGUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2011
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARGUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Intec Gesellschaft für; Informationstechnik mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Intec Gesellschaft für; Informationstechnik mbH
Intec Gesellschaft für; Informationstechnik mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Intec Gesellschaft für; Informationstechnik mbH
Intec Gesellschaft für; Informationstechnik mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Intec Gesellschaft für; Informationstechnik mbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring apparatus for digital telecommunication facilities, namely, multifunctional electric handheld tester for testing the integrity of telecommunication networks, excluding use with cellular telephone networks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intec Gesellschaft für; Informationstechnik mbH
- Other trademarks owned by Intec Gesellschaft für; Informationstechnik mbH
- Other trademarks owned by Intec Gesellschaft für; Informationstechnik mbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ARGUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |