Drawing for ARGUS

USPTO serial 79082982

ARGUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4054526Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 15, 2011
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARGUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Measuring apparatus for digital telecommunication facilities, namely, multifunctional electric handheld tester for testing the integrity of telecommunication networks, excluding use with cellular telephone networksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 29, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 28, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 22, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 22, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 17, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 19, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 15, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 22, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 18, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 31, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 26, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2010SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance