USPTO serial 79083011
100.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 100.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin W. Schiffmiller
Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller& Pieroni425 Fifth Avenue, 5th FloorNew York, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes, bleaching preparations for household use, bleaching preparations for laundry use; substances for laundry use, namely, soap, detergent, starch and fabric conditioner; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; hair lotions; dentifrices; disposable wipes made of paper, cotton, fiber, plastics or combinations thereof, impregnated with cosmetic skin cleansers, non-medicated skin care preparations, and cleaning chemicals and compounds for personal use and for use on furniture, floors and for industrial and commercial use; disposable masks made of paper, cotton, fiber, plastics of combinations thereof, impregnated with cosmetic skin cleansers, non-medicated skin care preparations, and cleaning chemicals and compounds for personal use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, namely insect-repellent preparations, sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food for babies; medical plasters, medical and surgical dressings, tooth fillings and materials for making dental impressions, all-purpose disinfectants, disinfectants for hygiene and sanitary purposes; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides; disposable wipes and masks made of paper, cotton, fiber, plastics or combinations thereof impregnated with detergents in the nature of disinfectant cleaners for hygienic and sanitary purposes; bandages for skin wounds, adhesive bandages, sanitary bandages for skin wounds, adhesive sanitary bandages, sanitary towels, paper diapers, incontinence diapers, disposable adult diapers; and hygienic pants for incontinence, panty liners; sanitary towels, antiseptic cotton for medical, sanitary and hygienic purposes, disinfecting and all purpose disinfecting and deodorizing preparations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Paper diapers, disposable diapers; bookbinding material; photographs; stationery; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; paint brushes; typewriters; plastic materials for packaging, namely plastic bags, plastic bubble packs; printing type; printing blocks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2011 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |