Drawing for BAYNE

USPTO serial 79083175

BAYNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAYNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; make-up, eyeliner and lipstick; body care preparations, namely skin cleansing creams and lotions, skin moisturising creams and lotions, after-shave creams and lotions and skin-tanning creams and lotions; sun protection creams and lotions; shaving creams and gels; hair care preparations, namely shampoos and conditioners; essential oils and massage oils; perfumes and eau de Cologne; dentifrices; soaps, soap gels; potpourriSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 22, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 21, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance