USPTO serial 79083290
ASB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4024583Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2011
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ASB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stein, DE
DE
DE
Grabenstält, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Marrero
Michael A. Marrero Ulmer & Berne LLP600 Vine StreetSuite 2800Cincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Building materials of metal to be used in connection with construction of prefabricated squash courts, namely, girders, door fittings, building boards in the nature of wall panels, laths, masts, poles, metal door frames, metal window frames, and framework of metal for building, moldings, partitions, wall linings and signboards of common metal; building elements and building materials of metal for sports facilities, in particular for squash courts, namely, building wall framing made primarily of metal, cladding of metal; construction elements made of metal, namely, fabricated metal components for squash courts; modular metallic buildings in the nature of squash courts; portable metal buildings in the nature of squash courts; transportable buildings of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Building materials not of metal to be used in connection with construction of prefabricated squash courts, namely, building timber, semi-worked woods, boards of wood, building panels in the nature of wood panels for building construction purposes, planks, wood veneers, wood trim, wood window frames, floors, parquet flooring, parquet floor boards, floor tiles, window glass not being glass for vehicle windows, plate glass for building, wood paneling, compressed cork in the nature of cork tiles and tiles of cork-based conglomerates for floor, wall and ceiling coverings, laths, architectural moldings, frame and framework for buildings in the nature of non-metal window frames, ceilings in the nature of ceiling panels not of metal; building elements and building materials not of metal for sports facilities, in particular for squash courts, namely, building timber, athletic flooring; transportable buildings not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction, repairs and installation, in particular building construction information, building construction supervision, electric appliance installation and repair, interior and exterior surface cleaning of buildings, interior and exterior painting, varnishing; maintenance, repair, restoration and servicing of sport facilities, in particular squash courts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, research and design, in particular architectural research and design, architectural consultation, engineering, surveying, architectural and construction drafting and consultation, technical project planning in the field of sports facilities, material testing; industrial analysis and research, in particular industrial design; scientific, technical and industrial analysis and research services in connection with project planning, design, construction and erection of sports facilities, in particular squash courts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Systembau Horst Babinsky GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Systembau Horst Babinsky GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Systembau Horst Babinsky GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Horst Babinsky
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |