USPTO serial 79083349
ANCHORAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANCHORAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Arthrodesis and osteosynthesis screw plate systems used particularly for hand, wrist, foot and ankle surgery; osteosynthesis locking screw plate systems; adjustable compression osteosynthesis screw plate systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS I, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS V, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MEMOMETAL TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ANCHORAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |