USPTO serial 79083367
GREENOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4027594Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2011
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GREENOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
49525 Lengerich, DE
49525 Lengerich, DE
49525 Lengerich, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Cosmovici
244 Fifth Avenue, 2nd Floor # suite-1279New York, NY 10001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for manufacturing, stacking and packaging flat empty packaging materials, namely, sacks and bags of paper and plastic; printing machines and colour units, essentially consisting of ink supply, distributing and transfer rollers, stereo vulcanizing presses, stereo grinding machines, plate mounting machines, ink tubs-washing machines; paper and film refining machines, namely, laminating and coating machines, film extrusion machines, screw-type extrusion machines, film tube blowing machines and film cooling machines, reversing tube haul-off machines, reel winding machines, unwinding machines, small reel winding machines and automatic small rollers for packaging industry; paper and foil converting machines, namely, label punching machines, wall paper machines, sack filling machines, sack closing machines, film stretching machines, tape stretching machines; circular automatic looms for production of woven plastic fabrics; structural parts for all the aforementioned machinery, lines, apparatuses and looms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |