Drawing for SEEBERGER

USPTO serial 79083466

SEEBERGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3953611Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 3, 2011
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEEBERGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel R. Cooper

Daniel R. Cooper COOPER & KURZ170 EDEN ROADSTAMFORD, CT 06907UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; dried fruits for nutrition purposes; dried fruit for nutrition purposes; processed peanuts; processed nuts; fruit peels; bagged, canned, bottled, dried, and frozen fruit slices; processed almonds; processed lentils; tinned fruit; nut grainsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030[ Coffee; tea; cocoa; cocoa-based beverages; cocoa products, namely, mixes, powers and spreads; sugar; spices; nutmegs; popcorn; rice; processed grains ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
031Class 31: Fresh peanuts; fresh nuts; fresh almonds; fresh fruits; Fresh Vegetables, namely, fresh lentils; fresh berries; citrus fruits; unprocessed grains; raw cocoa beans; fresh hazelnutsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 29, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 26, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 3, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 19, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 2, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 26, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 26, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 201771.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 13, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2017PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jun 12, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 3, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 27, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 19, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 4, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 29, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2010CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 6, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 6, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 13, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 13, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance