Drawing for TOSCANO

USPTO serial 79083547

TOSCANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOSCANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam D. Trudell

Miriam D. Trudell Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 Broadway, Suite 1200Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Extra virgin olive oilSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 15, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 10, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 17, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 14, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 9, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 9, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance