USPTO serial 79083623
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for managing the procurement or purchasing process for corporations or other businesses, not to include management or procurement of co-location, telecommunication, or computer inter-connection services; Computer software for managing the procurement or purchasing process for corporations or other businesses that may be downloaded from a global computer network, not to include management or procurement of co-location, telecommunication, or computer inter-connection services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Providing an on-line computer database in the field of business information and business contacts; advertising; consultancy with respect to participation in e-commerce; customer service information in connection with the sale of office requisites; the bringing together for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods and services, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods and services from an Internet website particularly specializing in the marketing of the sale of goods and services of others; business administration and planning; commercial consultancy; procuring of contracts for the purchase and sale of goods, none of the foregoing to include co-location, telecommunication, or computer inter-connection services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | [ Financial consultancy ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |