Drawing for MADE IN

USPTO serial 79083640

MADE IN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADE IN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, lotions for hair care, liquid soaps, bath and shower lotions, shampoos and lotions for hair care, milk for body care and lotions for body careSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 12, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 18, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 8, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance