USPTO serial 79083649
SMYTHSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMYTHSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin P. Hoffman
Martin P. Hoffman Stein McEwen, LLP.1400 Eye Street, N.W.Suite 300Washington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely suits, tuxedos,trousers, pants, jeans, leggings, jodhpurs, jackets, blazers, skirts, blouses, shirts, shorts, dresses, waistcoats, ties, neckties, sweaters, cardigans, sweatshirts, track suits, sweatpants, T-shirts, jumpers, pullovers, rainwear, coats, house jackets, vests, gloves, belts, scarves, bandanas, beachwear, skiwear, tennis wear and swim wear, socks, wraps, underwear, lingerie, brassieres, stockings, tights, hosiery, bed jackets, underpants, night gowns, night shirts, dressing gowns, sleepwear, pajamas, footwear, headgear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |