USPTO serial 79083725
PI PROFIBUS · PROFINET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4085670Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2012
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PI PROFIBUS · PROFINET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald S. Lombard, Esquire
Ronald S. Lombard, Esquire LAW OFFICE OF RONALD S. LOMBARD4430 TWIN OAKS DRIVEMURRYSVILLE, PA 15668UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Electrotechnical and electronic appliances, devices and instruments, namely, electronic sensors, electronic actuators, electronic controllers and microcomputers, human machine interface devices, connectors, computer hardware and computer software for use in manufacturing and process control; electrical signalling, measuring, counting, recording, monitoring, testing, open and closed-loop control and switching devices; electrical devices for input, processing, transmission, storage and output of data; parts of the mentioned above appliances, devices and instruments namely, electronic components and subassemblies, power supplies, electric cables, optical fibres; data processing programs, * all the aforesaid goods only for the industrial automation, including industrial building automation and automation in the field of energy production and energy distribution as well as for vehicle automation, in particular of trains and ships * ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Printed material, namely, manuals, [ data sheets ] and technical documentation pertaining to information and data systems technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development, generation [ and renting ] of data processing systems and programs for data processing systems, * all the aforesaid services only for the industrial automation, including industrial building automation [ and automation in the field of energy production and energy distribution as well as for vehicle automation, in particular of trains and ships * ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFIBUS Nutzerorganisation e.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFIBUS Nutzerorganisation e.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFIBUS Nutzerorganisation e.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFIBUS Nutzerorganisation e.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PI PROFIBUS · PROFINET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 6, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2012 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 5, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |