USPTO serial 79083746
URALITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4075719Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2011
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URALITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith J. Swedo
Keith J. Swedo Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP10 W. Market St.Suite 2700Indianapolis, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys; metal building materials, namely, curved roof tiles, ventilation roof tiles, chimney bases, roof verges, roof ridge tiles, half tiles, ducts for ventilation; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal, and ironmongery, namely, rivets, cramps and nails of metal; pipes and tubes of metal; metal safes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Rubber, gutta-percha, gum, namely, natural rubber, asbestos and mica; plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture; packing, insulating materials; flexible non-metallic pipes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, interlocking clay tiles; non-metallic rigid pipes for building; asphalt, pitch, bitumen; non-metallic transportable buildings; non-metallic monuments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Construction of buildings; repair of buildings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by URALITA, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by URALITA, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by URALITA, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named URALITA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 17, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |