USPTO serial 79083812
ACCUBOOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCUBOOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for use in the field of cancer diagnostics and treatment and brachytherapy, namely, image guided brachytherapy and adaptive brachytherapy apparatus and instruments comprising computer hardware and computer software for use in radio-oncology; brachytherapy treatment systems comprised of medical computer hardware and computer software for the control of generating and delivering electromagnetic or ionising radiation; medical computer software and computer hardware for processing image information; computer hardware and software for converting the image information into a treatment plan and means for delivering treatment | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments for use in the field of cancer diagnostics and treatment and brachytherapy, including image guided brachytherapy and adaptive brachytherapy; medical apparatus for surgical interventions and applications; brachytherapy apparatus using ionising radiation for medical use; templates, applicators and treatment delivery positioning accessories; apparatus and devices for capturing images of the area to be treated; applicators and applicator components all for use in radio-oncology, cancer and brachytherapy treatment; materials and sources for medical use, namely a delivery system comprising devices that produce either ionising radiation or ionising sources to diagnose or treat cancer | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Training related to image guided brachytherapy | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical services, namely treatment planning and delivery, and customized service support related to image guided brachytherapy | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software and licensing of intellectual property related to image guided brachytherapy | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NUCLETRON OPERATIONS B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Nucletron B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ACCUBOOST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |