Drawing for WORK

USPTO serial 79083879

WORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Clothing and footwear providing protection against accidents and fire; protective helmetsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 29, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 22, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 24, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance