Drawing for BILLION

USPTO serial 79083941

BILLION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BILLION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing; trousers; knitwear (clothing); caps (headwear); footwear; girdles; hosiery; gloves (clothing); motorists' clothing; gymnastic shoesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 1, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 30, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2010ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2010CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 3, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 13, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 20, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance