Drawing for STPT

USPTO serial 79083955

STPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4047494Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 1, 2011
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water distribution installations, namely, irrigation sprinklers, watering machines for agricultural purposes; disinfectant apparatus, namely, dish disinfectant apparatus for industrial purposes, disinfecting ultraviolet lamps housed in a container or cover for disinfecting objects placed therein; water purification installation; water filtering apparatus; purification installations for sewage; filters for drinking water; water purifying apparatus and machines; water softening apparatus and installationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 1, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 15, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 13, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 8, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 6, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 28, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 1, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 22, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 24, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance