USPTO serial 79084035
JILL ASHLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JILL ASHLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus Stephen Harris
Marcus Stephen Harris Marcus Stephen Harris LLC10 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 3500Chicago, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, lingerie, bathing suit and nightwear; comfortable clothing, namely, loungewear; footwear and headwear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 18, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |