USPTO serial 79084092
OPULENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4103562Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2012
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPULENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela B. Huff
Pamela B. Huff Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner P.A.P.O. Box 2938Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; perfumes; eau de toilette; eau de Cologne; [ essential oils; soaps, namely, bar soaps, soaps for household use, soaps for personal use, beauty soaps; beauty milks; deodorants for the body; beauty creams, eye creams, skin creams, body creams, facial creams; gels for hair styling and hair sculpting, eye gels, beauty gels, skin gels for moisturizing, cleansing or toning, facial gels for moisturizing, cleansing or toning, body gels for moisturizing, cleansing or toning; beauty milks, skin milks for moisturizing, cleansing or toning, face milks for moisturizing, cleansing or toning, body milks; hair lotions, hand lotions, face lotions, skin lotions, body lotions; hair masks in the nature of hair conditioners, skin masks, facial masks, body masks, beauty masks; pomades; skin care powders and preparations in the nature of skin lotions, skin creams, skin gels for moisturizing, cleansing or toning, skin masks, skin milks for moisturizing, cleansing or toning, skin foams for moisturizing, cleansing or toning; cosmetic products for sun protection, cosmetic preparations for bronzing and tanning of the skin; depilatory products in the nature of depilatory preparations; hair lotions and hair sprays; hair shampoo; after shave lotions; nail varnish; cosmetic bath preparations, namely, bath salts, bath foams, bath creams, bath gels, bath lotions; eye shadow; blusher; ] foundation; make-up [ and make-up removers ]; [ false eyelashes; ] cosmetic sets comprised of cosmetics, namely, [ eye-liner, eye shadow, mascara, lip-liner, lipstick, lip gloss, lip balm, blusher, bronzer, ]foundation [, powder ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mesyl Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Mesyl Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Mesyl Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Jentry (International) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named OPULENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 28, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |