Drawing for TALENTO

USPTO serial 79084228

TALENTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TALENTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia K. Stephenson

Posz Law Group, PLC12040 South Lakes DriveSuite 101Reston, VA 20191

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Sparkling winesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 4, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 3, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 9, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance