USPTO serial 79084259
ECOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4054531Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2011
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ECOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Kelley
Scott W. Kelley KELLY & KELLEY, LLP6320 Canoga AvenueSuite 1650Woodland Hills, CA, 91367Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Alarms and alarm signaling equipment for warning of danger, fire, accidents or technical defects of machinery in factories, machinery, and tunnels, aboard ships, or on large structures, motorways, and bridges ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Air cooling apparatus; chillers for cooling control cabinets, fluid media, welding/laser equipment, spindle, motors, drives and process systems to applications on test rigs, in tool construction or in laboratories; air cooling apparatus for climate control of switching cabinets, electrical cabinets, and control cabinets; air cooling apparatus for top walls, side walls and doors of switching cabinets, electrical cabinets, or control cabinets; ventilation apparatus, namely, ventilating fans for commercial use, and inlet and outlet filters as component parts thereof; air/water heat exchangers not being parts of machines; electric heaters for commercial use; filter fans for thermal management of electronic enclosures; thermostats; hygrostats (humidifiers) for the protection of electronic equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | [ Telecommunications consultation ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pfannenberg GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Pfannenberg GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Pfannenberg GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named ECOOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |