Drawing for PHENOMICSCREEN

USPTO serial 79084470

PHENOMICSCREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHENOMICSCREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff

Laurel V. Dineff Dineff Trademark Law Limited160 N. Wacker Dr.Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in assays development, drug research and development, and biological imaging, recorded, in the field of science, medicines, drugs, biology, biotechnology; computer software for use in identifying active compounds, recorded, in the field of science, medicines, drugs, biology, biotechnology; computer programs, recorded, for identifying chemical compounds that exert an effect of interest in a live disease model; computer programs in the nature of downloadable software for use in assays development, searching active compounds and identifying chemical compounds that exert an effect of interest in a live disease modelSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 29, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 21, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 4, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 11, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 6, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 16, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 30, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 27, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 4, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 29, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance