Drawing for KOUZINA

USPTO serial 79084515

KOUZINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOUZINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016CookbooksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Restaurants; hospitality services (food and drink)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 27, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 30, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 29, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance