Drawing for CALIPSO

USPTO serial 79084537

CALIPSO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALIPSO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines; components for machines, included in this class, in particular machines and installations for diffusion processesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Ovens; furnaces for industrial use; industrial furnaces; electric heat-treating furnaces, in particular furnaces for diffusion processesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
040Treatment of materials, in particular for diffusion of particles in substratesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2021UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 13, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 12, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 13, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 29, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance