Drawing for DODUBOND

USPTO serial 79084627

DODUBOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3972701Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 7, 2011
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DODUBOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia A. Cigelnik

1037 Concord CircleMundelein, IL 60060UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for coating surfaces with metal, in particular for electroplating and for wet chemical, electroless plating; galvanizing baths; chemical baths for coating surfaces, namely, chemical baths for electroplating and for electroless plating; chemical baths for the pre-treatment of surfaces prior to the coating thereof, and for the post-treatment of surfaces after the coating thereof; metal salts, in particular precious metal salts; metal salt solutions for electroplating and chemical bathsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Treatment of materials and of surfaces, namely, metal treating, metal plating, electroplating, electroless platingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 10, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 17, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 12, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 12, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 26, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 13, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 7, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 31, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance