Drawing for I I-MAX

USPTO serial 79084820

I I-MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COOPER, CHRISTINE H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I I-MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metalworking machines; machine presses; threading machines; machining centers; drilling machines; grinding machines; engraving machines; trimming machines; pneumatic drills; electrical drills; drilling bits parts of machines; drill chucks parts of machines; bits parts of machines; electric drivers for machines; taps parts of machines; lapping machines for metalworking; milling cutters for milling machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 4, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 28, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 18, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 25, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 24, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance