Drawing for TORO

USPTO serial 79084828

TORO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TORO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water purifying apparatusABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2021UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 11, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 10, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 7, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 7, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 7, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 2015OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 2011OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2011OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Sep 17, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 6, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 5, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 5, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 5, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 5, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 2, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance