USPTO serial 79084876
YES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Snowboards and bindings for snowboards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |