Drawing for AMBRO

USPTO serial 79084908

AMBRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMBRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metal building material, namely, fascia; non-metal decorative moldings and decorative trim for use in building construction; raw and coated chip boards for the building industry, furniture and interior decorating; door panels, not of metal; non-metal doors; structural and architectural members formed of pressed wood fibers; veneer wood; glue-laminated woodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 13, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 13, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 13, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2010SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance