USPTO serial 79084930
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Optical apparatuses and instruments, namely, microscopes; telecommunication devices and apparatuses, namely, intercoms; digital cameras; cell phones; electronic photocopiers; scanners; fax machines; televisions; electric navigational instruments; optical disk drives; printers; digital audio players; electronic machines and apparatuses, namely, computers; electronic notice boards; parts of all the above mentioned goods, namely, ] optical lenses in the nature of diffusing lenses; lenses for LEDs in the nature of optical lenses; optical lenses for lasers; optical lenses in the nature of collecting lenses; collimator lenses; optical lenses in the nature of micro-lens array; [ prisms for optics purposes in the nature of prism sheets; optical lenses in the nature of pickup lenses; ] optical lenses; optical lenses in the nature of diffraction lenses; [ polarizers; ] backlights for liquid crystal panel, namely, surface light source using LEDs; light signboards, LED signboards [, electronic signboards, all of wood or plastic ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Solar water heaters and their parts, namely, sunbeam control lenses being solar collectors; ] electronic lamps and other lighting apparatuses, namely, LED lighting fixtures for use in display, commercial, industrial, residential and architectural accent lighting applications, and their parts, namely, optical lens covers that improve light output and uniformity and protect the LED, sold as a feature of an LED lighting system | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |