Drawing for PROTEX

USPTO serial 79084959

PROTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Simor L. Moskowitz

Simor L. Moskowitz Jacobson Holman PLLC400 7th St., N.W.6th FloorWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Proteolytic enzymes and enzyme preparations for industrial uses, namely, for use in the pulp and paper industry, fishmeal production industry, fish stickwater processing industry, chondroitin sulfate production industry, heparin production industry, processing of plant-derived and animal-derived waste materials, yeast processing industry, industrial fermentation industry, silver recovery from imaging film, wastewater and sludge processing industry, nonsolvent oilseed processing industry, contact lens cleaning solution industry, xanthan gum production industry, leather production industry, gelatin production industry, and medical instrument cleaning formulations industryABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 26, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2012MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2012ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 6, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 5, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance