Drawing for MYSILO

USPTO serial 79084968

MYSILO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4072461Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 20, 2011
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYSILO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Lazouski

Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLCSuite 1, 14726 Bowfin Ter.Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Grain storage systems, namely, metal silos and metal silos comprising non-mechanical metal hoppers, metal ladders and prefabricated metal catwalks, metal safety cages, metal roof vents for ventilation, metal hopper access doors, metal floors, metal doors, metal wall panels, metal roofing, metal stairs and grab rails, prefabricated metal platforms, both stationary and mobile, metal storage tanks, metal silo and grain storage measuring sensors, and metal structural parts for the aforementioned goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Grain handling equipment, namely, machinery used in connection with grain storage systems and metal silos, namely, telescoping conveying machines, man and load elevators, elevating work platforms, powered loading ramps, lifts, namely, bucket elevators, cranes, chain hoists, escalators, belt conveyors, spiral binding machines for industrial use, aeration systems, namely, fans for machine engines, and monitoring sensors for maintaining temperature, humidity, and desired grain and feed levels; the aforementioned grain handling machines used for separating, sorting, processing, loading, unloading, storing and transporting grain and feedSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 20, 2023XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2023XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 1, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 1, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 20, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 9, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 7, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 11, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 20, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 27, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 25, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance