USPTO serial 79084968
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SILOPORT TAHIL DEPOLAMA SISTEMLERI SAN.VE TIC. A.S.
Cad. No:52/BAKSARAY, TR
Other trademarks owned by SILOPORT TAHIL DEPOLAMA SISTEMLERI SAN.VE TIC. A.S.
CIFTK KARTAL TAHIL DEPOLAMA SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
AKSARAY, TR
Other trademarks owned by CIFTK KARTAL TAHIL DEPOLAMA SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
CIFTK KARTAL TAHIL DEPOLAMA SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
AKSARAY, TR
Other trademarks owned by CIFTK KARTAL TAHIL DEPOLAMA SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLCSuite 1, 14726 Bowfin Ter.Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Grain storage systems, namely, metal silos and metal silos comprising non-mechanical metal hoppers, metal ladders and prefabricated metal catwalks, metal safety cages, metal roof vents for ventilation, metal hopper access doors, metal floors, metal doors, metal wall panels, metal roofing, metal stairs and grab rails, prefabricated metal platforms, both stationary and mobile, metal storage tanks, metal silo and grain storage measuring sensors, and metal structural parts for the aforementioned goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Grain handling equipment, namely, machinery used in connection with grain storage systems and metal silos, namely, telescoping conveying machines, man and load elevators, elevating work platforms, powered loading ramps, lifts, namely, bucket elevators, cranes, chain hoists, escalators, belt conveyors, spiral binding machines for industrial use, aeration systems, namely, fans for machine engines, and monitoring sensors for maintaining temperature, humidity, and desired grain and feed levels; the aforementioned grain handling machines used for separating, sorting, processing, loading, unloading, storing and transporting grain and feed | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 20, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |