Drawing for ZPEC

USPTO serial 79084988

ZPEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4120027Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 3, 2012
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZPEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007rinsing machines, namely, machines for rinsing industrial parts; coalcutting machines; extractors for mines; mine borers; drilling machines; mine-working machines, namely, mining drills; mining haulage apparatus, namely, conveyors, conveyor machines, conveyor lines; machines and equipments for geological explorations, mining, and used for ore dressing, namely, drills for mining, earth excavating machines, vibratory screen separators; mine drainage pumps; winches for minesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 4, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 24, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 30, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 9, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 9, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 3, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 24, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2011GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2011GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2011NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 29, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance