USPTO serial 79085073
OSSIAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OSSIAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financing services; financial analysis; mutual fund investment;capital investments; financial consultancy | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research, engineering and development in the fields of economics, finance and portfolio management; design and development of computer softwares | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |