Drawing for M

USPTO serial 79085388

M

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3940049Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 5, 2011
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeannine Rittenhouse

Jeannine Rittenhouse IpHorgan, Ltd.195 Arlington Heights RoadSuite 125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer [ mineral waters, soft drinks; syrups for making non-alcoholic beverages, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
039[ Transport, storage and delivery for goods; merchandise packaging for others; organization of travel ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2020LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 12, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2020LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 5, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 21, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 12, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 12, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2017C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 12, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 17, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 17, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 5, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 18, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 8, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance