Drawing for FIG

USPTO serial 79085483

FIG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4058081Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 22, 2011
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Variable diameter pole connectors of non-metallic materials for building garden structures; non metallic pole connectors for building garden structures with variable diameter poles; cane-shaped pole connectors of non-metallic materials for building garden frames or clochesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 3, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 6, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 28, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 29, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 22, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 22, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 6, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 4, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 10, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 30, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 27, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance