USPTO serial 79085528
PREVALED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREVALED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milton M. Oliver, Esq.
MILTON M. OLIVER, ESQ. OLIVER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLCPO BOX 790COTUIT, MA 02635UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Light emitting diodes; Light emitting diode arrays; LED modules; LED circuit boards; Electronic Control Gear, namely circuits for controlling the voltage, current, and timing of electricity applied for driving solid-state light sources; Power Supplies for Light Sources; Software for use in microcontrollers which regulate the emission of light from LEDs and LED arrays; Semiconductor components, namely chips which emit light in response to application of an electrical voltage thereto; Occupancy Sensors, namely electronic devices which detect the presence of occupants and control a lighting system accordingly; and replacement component parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, that is electric lamps and luminaires; Lighting apparatus, namely LED light engines, comprised of LED illumination modules and electronic control gear for driving the same, LED lighting fixtures for use in commercial, industrial, residential, and architectural accent lighting applications; LED lighting systems, namely LED modules, reflectors, diffusing lenses, power supplies and wiring, sold as a unit; LED lighting facilities, LED based lighting apparatus, LED luminaires; and replacement component parts of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |