Drawing for MADEX

USPTO serial 79085672

MADEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4021217Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 6, 2011
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MADEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Products for destroying vermin, namely, preparations for destroying verminACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 15, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 4, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 4, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 21, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 3, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 9, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 6, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 3, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 29, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 27, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2010SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance