Drawing for VALENTA

USPTO serial 79085675

VALENTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALENTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Boxes, frames and cases for apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing sounds or images, including cases for mobile telephonesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Covers for vehicles and vehicle seatsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Leather and goods made thereof included in this class; imitation leather and goods made of these materials included in this classSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
022Tarpaulins, tents, vehicle coversSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, shoes, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 17, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 23, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 11, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 1, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 1, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 31, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2010SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance