USPTO serial 79085799
OXYMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 26, 2013
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with OXYMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Endress+Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbh+Co.KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Endress+Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbh+Co.KG
Endress+Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbh+Co.KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Endress+Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbh+Co.KG
Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co.KG
Gerlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co.KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, analytical sensors for analyzing aqueous media for the presence of dissolved gasses, sensors for measuring the concentration of dissolved gasses, optical sensors, [ potentiometric sensors ] and amperometric sensors, [ data processing equipment and computers, ] all of the aforementioned goods solely for use in the field of industrial process instrumentation and process automation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Endress+Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbh+Co.KG
- Other trademarks owned by Endress+Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbh+Co.KG
- Other trademarks owned by Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co.KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OXYMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |