USPTO serial 79085811
42 TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4235677Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2012
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with 42 TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael K. Kinney
Michael K. Kinney MKG, LLC20 Tuttle PlaceSuite 8MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design services provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers during product design, packaging design and manufacturing process design, and design consultancy provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers, in the field of product engineering, process engineering, process automation, mechanical products, mechanical systems, electronic products, electronic systems, sensors, computer systems, user interface design, packaging; technology consultancy provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers, in the field of the specification, conception, feasibility and development of mechanical products, mechanical systems, electronic products, electronic systems, computer systems, sensors, packaging, process automation; technology consultancy provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers, in the field of energy usage efficiency and sustainability in the manufacture and use of products; engineering services provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers, engineering consultancy provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers, industrial design provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers, product development provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers, software design provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers; industrial design provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers and design for manufacture provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers, in the field of mechanical products, mechanical systems, electronic products, electronic systems, sensors, computer systems, user interface design, packaging; mathematical modeling and analysis provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers, in the field of mechanical products, mechanical systems, electronic products, electronic systems, sensors, computer systems, packaging; new product regulatory approval consultancy provided to other manufacturers, producers and retailers in the field of medical products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 42 Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by 42 Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by 42 Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by 42 Technology Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named 42 TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |